Launch Week 3: Five days of launches

LangSmith traces your chains.
Confident AI grades every one of them.

Keep your LangChain and LangGraph spans. Confident AI scores every trace, span and thread, builds your datasets from production, catches drift and simulates conversations. Switch in three steps.

TRUSTED BY 500+ LEADING AI COMPANIES
Panasonic logo
Toshiba logo
Samsung logo
Phreesia logo
ByteDance logo
Epic Games logo
Humach logo
Finom logo
Amdocs logo
BCG logo
Evals ran to date[ 0+ ]
FRAMEWORK INTEGRATIONS

Any framework. The same depth.

LangSmith traces LangChain and LangGraph in full. Move a component to another framework, or hand-roll an agent, and the trace loses its shape. Confident AI gives 16 frameworks the same depth and the same evals.

“Thanks to Confident AI, we were able to move to a fine-tuned model and cut our LLM costs by 80%. This opens up whole new use cases now to generate better output with more targeted LLM calls.”

John Lemmon
John LemmonAI Lead, Supernormal
NO-CODE EVALS

Built-in metrics. Ready to run.

Online evaluators on LangSmith are prompts and code an engineer writes and maintains. Product and QA wait. Confident AI ships 50+ metrics and lets non-engineers run experiments over HTTP.

“Before Confident AI, a single improvement cycle took 10 days — I'd create a task, assign it to an engineer, wait for availability, and go back and forth. Now the same cycle takes three hours, and our product managers can run it themselves.”

Igor Kolodkin
Igor KolodkinHead of AI Quality, Finom
Read case study
CONVERSATION SIMULATION

Simulate conversations. Catch failures.

LangSmith runs and threads are logs. There is no way to simulate a user, run the whole conversation and score it before release. Confident AI does that on every release.

“We run a lot of large-scale, multi-turn simulations, and Confident AI made it far easier to design scenarios and execute those tests without piecing together external tools.”

Sean Austin
Sean AustinChief AI Officer, Humach
Read case study
The difference

Where LangSmith stops and Confident AI starts.

See what changes for your team. Compare workflows for PMs, engineers, QAs, and SMEs.

FeatureConfident AILangSmith
Validate evals
Check automated scores against human judgment
Surface issues automatically
Find recurring failures from production feedback
Find product insights
Understand patterns in real conversations
Not assessed
Find struggling users
See which users experience failures and poor responses
Not assessed
Cross-functional workflows
PMs and QA run evals without engineering
TESTIMONIALS

Trusted by companies that take AI seriously.

Finom logoFinom

Before Confident AI, a single improvement cycle took 10 days — I'd create a task, assign it to an engineer, wait for availability, and go back and forth. Now the same cycle takes three hours, and our product managers can run it themselves.

Igor Kolodkin
Igor Kolodkin,Head of AI Quality, Finom

Confident AI saves us 480+ hours of manual AI evaluation every month — and gives us the data to defend every quality decision in front of engineering, product, and leadership.

Anoop Mahajan
Anoop Mahajan,Director of QA, Amdocs

Confident AI gave our team one place to turn production failures into datasets, align metrics, and keep regressions out of releases without waiting on custom engineering work.

SD
Senior Director of Engineering,Fortune 500 medical device company
Humach logoHumach

We run a lot of large-scale, multi-turn simulations, and Confident AI made it far easier to design scenarios and execute those tests without piecing together external tools.

Sean Austin
Sean Austin,Chief AI Officer, Humach

Thanks to Confident AI, we were able to move to a fine-tuned model and cut our LLM costs by 80%. This opens up whole new use cases now to generate better output with more targeted LLM calls.

John Lemmon
John Lemmon,AI Lead, Supernormal